Skip to main content

Do you use this lame excuse?

A rightly focused life consists of fulfilling the expectations that we have formed ourselves based upon what God has spoken to us.

I often hear people speak of doing only what they can actually do and not worrying about what others expect them to do.  I agree.  But what happens once you've already agreed to something?  Does character and integrity not demand that you fulfill it?

We are not responsible for others expectations that we have  never invited, initiated nor agreed to. 

We are, however, responsible to fulfill an expectation when we initiate or consent to it.

For instance, part of getting married is making a covenant to fidelity.  What would it be like if your spouse later said, "I didn't meet your expectations in being faithful to you but I can only do what I can do..."

Let's say you apply for a job and before accepting the position they say, "this job is 40 hours a week."  So you come in the first week and work for 35 hours.  The following week you work 15, and the next week you work 30.  If they haven't fired you already, you speak up and say, "I know I haven't been working 40 hours.  I've come for whatever time I can, but you'll just have to understand that I can't fulfill all your expectations." That would be inappropriate and grounds for someone to fire you.

Most people would agree that this sounds kind of crazy, however people behave this way all time time.

Consider many of the people I coach.  They willingly come into the coaching relationship. If they are in my life coaching group they sign a contract before we start.  If they are someone I career coach through my job they sign what's called an engagement agreement with the company. Then when I start with them, in our first session we develop a set of expectations based upon what the client is interested in accomplishing.  

All of this is an agreement on their part to participate.

Many times they slack off to varying degrees.  Some don't show up for their session.  Some drop out altogether, others complete only a portion of the work.  Some communicate,  others say nothing at all.  Many times they just blithely say they are sorry they couldn't meet expectations.

I will never cease to be puzzled.

When others place expectations on us that we never invited nor agreed to, it is unwelcome and inappropriate.

When we initiate expectations and readily agree to them and then don't fulfill what we agreed to, it's not a case of personal boundary setting/ keeping nor using wisdom, it's a lack of integrity.

As far as Christians go, it gets old hearing people labeling a lack of integrity as "being led of the Lord in what to accomplish."  Once you've agreed to something it's no longer a matter of being spirit led.

That might sound good and grant you time for some extra naps.  But it's just spiritual gobbledygook.  At the point of your agreement to do something the issue of expectations transcends to a place that simply reveals whether you're either a person of your word or you're not. 

Character is very much a part of this issue although people would like to think it's just about hearing from God or boundaries. 

Comments

Terri von Wood said…
Or, as I heard growing up and have told my children: "All you have is who you are. Your reputation is more important than ANYTHING else!" We (Christians) should let our "Yes" be "Yes!" :) Sometimes, I say yes to too many things....I bite the bullet and get it done....there is no other choice!
Terri, I hear you! I too have said yes to too many things and then bite the bullet to do "whatever it takes" to get it done, believing that my integrity means there is no other choice. You are so right but what I don't understand is how so many Christians think there IS another choice, and that it is a perfectly fine choice. When it's an unbeliever I understand it. But how can Christians justify that?
kathy said…
Great word Deanna; I often think of integrity when people sign the commitment form for church membership. What promises are made there to be a part of the body of Christ. Integrity is a great problem even in our churches where making an oath before God should stand for something.
I think of that too, Kathy. I agree with you. Most people do not fulfill the responsibilities of membership but they sure do want the privileges.
Terri von Wood said…
Deanna: I like the way The Message says it.....and I think that's the inherent problem. Because people don't take the time to read the Word they don't know what it says so they can't possible do it! :)

Colossians 3:23
The Message (MSG)

22-25Servants, do what you're told by your earthly masters. And don't just do the minimum that will get you by. Do your best. Work from the heart for your real Master, for God, confident that you'll get paid in full when you come into your inheritance. Keep in mind always that the ultimate Master you're serving is Christ. The sullen servant who does shoddy work will be held responsible. Being a follower of Jesus doesn't cover up bad work.

Popular posts from this blog

What To Do First to Make a Profit

Today on Seth Godin's blog, he said:

It's tempting to decide to make a profit first, then invest in training, people, facilities, promotion, customer service and most of all, doing important work. In general, though, it goes the other way.
Yes, it does. If you are waiting to make a profit before you do these things, in my experience you're  not going to make a profit. So many organizations, ministries and churches are struggling with financial issues. I know your pain. As anyone who follows our story knows, our ministry was in a ton of debt four years ago when I came on as director.  Since that time, we've gotten out of debt and turned a profit every year.  God has done amazing things through out team, for which we give Him the glory!

I find that what Seth is saying here is absolutely true, with one disclaimer. For Christian leaders, spiritual disciplines must always be first. Before we started investing and training and all of that, seeking God for his blessing and…

Why You Should Never Hijack a Comment Thread
Social media etiquette 101

One surefire way to kill your influence in social media and wear out your welcome fast is to become involved in derailing somebody’s comment thread with your own agenda. Networking and hijacking aren’t the same thing. It’s surprising how many people don’t understand that this is a guarantee for tearing down a platform as quickly as you build it.


Passion is good, even necessary. I appreciate people's zeal for their personal core values. What is not appreciated is the attempt at a redirection of a comment thread when the comment has little or nothing to do with an original post or is twisted at best.

Social media provides ample opportunity for all of us to share what’s important to us on our own platform. Eliciting others’ responses and developing connections largely depends on our ability to communicate and compel. Some people are open to receiving private communication from others although they aren’t always able to answer personally or at length. But hijacking a comment thread no…

I'm Just Being Transparent...

This year at the Stronger Conference, a young minister stopped me as I was walking out of the room at the conclusion of a workshop and she said, "I want to tell you something..." (I was all ears.) She said, "Do you notice how many of the speakers this weekend are saying, "Now, I'm just being transparent when I tell you..." or "I'm just keepin' it real..." I nodded yes. In fact, I mentioned that I was one of those speakers. I think I probably said a few times in both my keynote message and my workshop that I was just "keepin' it real."

After I affirmed that yes, I had noticed that -- she said, "Do you know why they have to do that? They do it...and you do it, because so many people don't keep it real. So many in leadership aren't transparent, Deanna. That's why all these people speaking here feel an urge to declare their transparency.." I let her know that usually when I say, "I'm just keeping …