Skip to main content

Do you use this lame excuse?

A rightly focused life consists of fulfilling the expectations that we have formed ourselves based upon what God has spoken to us.

I often hear people speak of doing only what they can actually do and not worrying about what others expect them to do.  I agree.  But what happens once you've already agreed to something?  Does character and integrity not demand that you fulfill it?

We are not responsible for others expectations that we have  never invited, initiated nor agreed to. 

We are, however, responsible to fulfill an expectation when we initiate or consent to it.

For instance, part of getting married is making a covenant to fidelity.  What would it be like if your spouse later said, "I didn't meet your expectations in being faithful to you but I can only do what I can do..."

Let's say you apply for a job and before accepting the position they say, "this job is 40 hours a week."  So you come in the first week and work for 35 hours.  The following week you work 15, and the next week you work 30.  If they haven't fired you already, you speak up and say, "I know I haven't been working 40 hours.  I've come for whatever time I can, but you'll just have to understand that I can't fulfill all your expectations." That would be inappropriate and grounds for someone to fire you.

Most people would agree that this sounds kind of crazy, however people behave this way all time time.

Consider many of the people I coach.  They willingly come into the coaching relationship. If they are in my life coaching group they sign a contract before we start.  If they are someone I career coach through my job they sign what's called an engagement agreement with the company. Then when I start with them, in our first session we develop a set of expectations based upon what the client is interested in accomplishing.  

All of this is an agreement on their part to participate.

Many times they slack off to varying degrees.  Some don't show up for their session.  Some drop out altogether, others complete only a portion of the work.  Some communicate,  others say nothing at all.  Many times they just blithely say they are sorry they couldn't meet expectations.

I will never cease to be puzzled.

When others place expectations on us that we never invited nor agreed to, it is unwelcome and inappropriate.

When we initiate expectations and readily agree to them and then don't fulfill what we agreed to, it's not a case of personal boundary setting/ keeping nor using wisdom, it's a lack of integrity.

As far as Christians go, it gets old hearing people labeling a lack of integrity as "being led of the Lord in what to accomplish."  Once you've agreed to something it's no longer a matter of being spirit led.

That might sound good and grant you time for some extra naps.  But it's just spiritual gobbledygook.  At the point of your agreement to do something the issue of expectations transcends to a place that simply reveals whether you're either a person of your word or you're not. 

Character is very much a part of this issue although people would like to think it's just about hearing from God or boundaries. 

Comments

Terri von Wood said…
Or, as I heard growing up and have told my children: "All you have is who you are. Your reputation is more important than ANYTHING else!" We (Christians) should let our "Yes" be "Yes!" :) Sometimes, I say yes to too many things....I bite the bullet and get it done....there is no other choice!
Terri, I hear you! I too have said yes to too many things and then bite the bullet to do "whatever it takes" to get it done, believing that my integrity means there is no other choice. You are so right but what I don't understand is how so many Christians think there IS another choice, and that it is a perfectly fine choice. When it's an unbeliever I understand it. But how can Christians justify that?
kathy said…
Great word Deanna; I often think of integrity when people sign the commitment form for church membership. What promises are made there to be a part of the body of Christ. Integrity is a great problem even in our churches where making an oath before God should stand for something.
I think of that too, Kathy. I agree with you. Most people do not fulfill the responsibilities of membership but they sure do want the privileges.
Terri von Wood said…
Deanna: I like the way The Message says it.....and I think that's the inherent problem. Because people don't take the time to read the Word they don't know what it says so they can't possible do it! :)

Colossians 3:23
The Message (MSG)

22-25Servants, do what you're told by your earthly masters. And don't just do the minimum that will get you by. Do your best. Work from the heart for your real Master, for God, confident that you'll get paid in full when you come into your inheritance. Keep in mind always that the ultimate Master you're serving is Christ. The sullen servant who does shoddy work will be held responsible. Being a follower of Jesus doesn't cover up bad work.

Popular posts from this blog

Relevant Church doing something...

incredibly RELEVANT!

I just heard some news today that really inspired me. A church here in Tampa, Relevant Church is doing a new thing this month called the "30 Days Sex Challenge." (I've never visited the church but Pastor Trinity - our children's pastor - has visited or has met some people from this church and he was very impressed.) Realizing that this is a major element missing from some marriages (the frequency factor) their lead pastor, Paul Wirth, has issued a challenge for all the married couples to have sex for 30 days in a row. At the same time he has issued a challenge for all unmarrieds to completely abstain from sex. Of course we know the Bible says that those who are unmarried should not have sex in the first place but the point is, a lot of unmarried's aren't obeying the Lord's command to abstain and this is just one pastor's way of trying to get them to see that indeed, there is a better way! (God's way!) At the same time, many married couples are no

This Could Have Ruined Everything... (But It Didn't!)

 No one would ever guess what happened to me this weekend in Jacksonville, Florida...so I'm going to tell you. :) As I was preaching at the Fearless Tour at New Hope Assembly of God this weekend,  I got choked up, literally. For probably 2-3 minutes I coughed profusely and greatly struggled. Then I drank some water and kept preaching. Everyone was gracious to give me a few moments to get my bearings. If you were there, you'll remember it! What no one realized at the time was that I swallowed a bug that flew right in while I was preaching! So disgusting! I said nothing because I was at a point in the sermon where I was really connecting and I knew if I said, "I swallowed a bug," everyone would either laugh profusely or be really concerned, or start feeling sorry for me.  And at that point whey wouldn't be thinking about the message anymore, but the fact that I had just swallowed a bug. They would then imagine what it would be like, and feel grossed out which

Why You Should Never Hijack a Comment Thread
Social media etiquette 101

One surefire way to kill your influence in social media and wear out your welcome fast is to become involved in derailing somebody’s comment thread with your own agenda. Networking and hijacking aren’t the same thing. It’s surprising how many people don’t understand that this is a guarantee for tearing down a platform as quickly as you build it. Passion is good, even necessary. I appreciate people's zeal for their personal core values. What is not appreciated is the attempt at a redirection of a comment thread when the comment has little or nothing to do with an original post or is twisted at best. Social media provides ample opportunity for all of us to share what’s important to us on our own platform. Eliciting others’ responses and developing connections largely depends on our ability to communicate and compel. Some people are open to receiving private communication from others although they aren’t always able to answer personally or at length. But hijacking a comment threa